Message104041
You are correct, it wasn't an argument. I've never seen numbered alternatives anywhere *except* the svn merge help (which I've never looked at before, since I/we don't use it for python development). And I don't like them. (svn merge uses them to cross reference the explanatory comments that follow, but I still don't like them and I think the svnmerge help would read better without them.)
I see your point about the alternate form, though you could still use -m by making sure your modified Lib dir was in PYTHONPATH, or run it with the Lib dir as the CWD. Without doing that I don't think you'd be testing your modified Lib directory anyway (though you would be running the modified test files). I'm not sure about that, though, I haven't run enough experiments :) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-23 19:44:50 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, eric.smith, techtonik, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo |
2010-04-23 19:44:49 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1272051889.92.0.134242159383.issue8325@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-04-23 19:44:48 | r.david.murray | link | issue8325 messages |
2010-04-23 19:44:47 | r.david.murray | create | |
|