Message102189
Well, the object returned is "just" an iterator (which happens to be implemented by a generator-iterator). I wouldn't be so concerned about the repr() of the it.
If you look at the generator PEP, number 255, it says:
"""Note that when the intent is clear from context, the unqualified name
"generator" may be used to refer either to a generator-function or a
generator-iterator."""
My experience is that most people use "generator" to mean the actual function. The returned object is mostly called iterator. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-02 19:36:20 | georg.brandl | set | recipients:
+ georg.brandl, jjposner |
2010-04-02 19:36:20 | georg.brandl | set | messageid: <1270236980.65.0.10453480402.issue8012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-04-02 19:36:19 | georg.brandl | link | issue8012 messages |
2010-04-02 19:36:18 | georg.brandl | create | |
|