➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2010-09-28 00:34 by fgallaire, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| platform_isposix_boolean.py | fgallaire, 2010-09-28 00:34 | Patch for the platform module (new boolean isposix). | ||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg117495 - (view) | Author: Florent Gallaire (fgallaire) * | Date: 2010-09-28 00:34 | |
Hi, The platform module could provide a boolean to know easily if a system is posix or not. The expected result, when the system is posix : >>> import platform >>> platform.isposix True otherwise : >>> import platform >>> platform.isposix False Here is a patch to do so. It also provides an update for the platform documentation and a test case. Best regards Florent Gallaire |
|||
| msg117497 - (view) | Author: Jean-Paul Calderone (exarkun) *  |
Date: 2010-09-28 00:37 | |
It could, but why introduce this redundancy with `os.name`? |
|||
| msg117499 - (view) | Author: Brian Curtin (brian.curtin) * |
Date: 2010-09-28 00:47 | |
I second what Jean-Paul said. os.name is well established and I don't think a second way to get the same information is needed. Thanks for the suggestion and patch, Florent. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:07 | admin | set | github: 54175 |
| 2010-09-28 00:47:05 | brian.curtin | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + brian.curtin messages: + msg117499 resolution: rejected stage: resolved |
| 2010-09-28 00:37:56 | exarkun | set | nosy:
+ exarkun messages: + msg117497 |
| 2010-09-28 00:34:43 | fgallaire | create | |