According the docs for the tempfile module, SpooledTemporaryFile()
should operate "exactly as TemporaryFile() does".  However, while
playing around trying to learn the module I found a couple of places
where this is not the case: 

import tempfile

hello = bytes('Hello World!', encoding='utf-8')
tf = tempfile.TemporaryFile()
stf = tempfile.SpooledTemporaryFile()

tf.write(hello)
stf.write(hello)

# (1) Read after write behaviour differs...
>>> print(tf.read())  
b'Hello World'
>>> print(stf.read())
b''

# ...unless you seek first
>>> tf.seek(0)
>>> stf.seek(0)
>>> print(tf.read())
b'Hello World'
>>> print(stf.read())
b'Hello World'


# (2) Name attribute is fragile...
>>> print(tf.name)
3
print(stf.name)
AttributeError: '_io.BytesIO' object has no attribute 'name'

# ...until StringIO object replaced
stf.rollover()
print(stf.name)   # 4

I'm not sure if this should be categorised as a documentation or code
issue. In either case please be gentle -- I'm still just learning Python
(evaluating it as a [now likely] replacement for PHP for web application
development in our company).  I'm filing this bug because, as a
beginner, I was confused by the inconsistency between the docs and the
actual behaviour.

I'd be happy to try and write documentation and/or unit tests about
this, if somebody would be willing to review them for me... :-)

I've attached a patch to SpooledTemporaryFile (and its test class) to
remove the suprising exceptions.

SpooledTemporaryFile uses a io.StringIO for storage (in self._file)
until it reaches a certain size (or rollover() is called), at which
point it switches to a file object (or _TemporaryFileWrapper on
non-posix platforms).  This implementation detail should be abstracted
away from the user.

The interface mismatch there which caused an AttributeError to be thrown
-- but only if the file size was new, or below a certain size.

Some properties seem to be broken no matter if the underlying storage
system is file or StringIO.

Properties: encoding, newlines, and softspace

And the method: xreadlines()

I'm not sure what the correct behaviour should be (although I'm pretty
sure xreadlines() should just be deleted -- but when?), so I haven't
tried to patch the code.  The attached patch is a just (a beginners idea
of a) test to confirm the problem.