Created on 2009-02-19 05:21 by grahamd, last changed 2009-06-30 17:13 by jnoller. This issue is now closed.
|papy_gui.py||i000, 2009-04-16 12:11||InteractiveConsole inside TkinterText|
|stdin_patch_v2.diff||jnoller, 2009-06-30 03:03|
|msg82457 - (view)||Author: Graham Dumpleton (grahamd)||Date: 2009-02-19 05:21|
In multiprocessing.process it contains the code: def _bootstrap(self): .... if sys.stdin is not None: try: os.close(sys.stdin.fileno()) except (OSError, ValueError): pass This code should probably be calling sys.stdin.close() and not os.close(sys.stdin.fileno()). The code as is will fail if sys.stdin had been replaced with an alternate file like object, such as StringIO, which doesn't have a fileno() method.
|msg82579 - (view)||Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) *||Date: 2009-02-21 19:53|
Joshua Judson Rosen to python-list Jesse Noller <email@example.com> writes: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Graham Dumpleton > <Graham.Dumpleton@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why is the multiprocessing module, ie., multiprocessing/process.py, in > > _bootstrap() doing: > > > > os.close(sys.stdin.fileno()) > > > > rather than: > > > > sys.stdin.close() > > > > Technically it is feasible that stdin could have been replaced with > > something other than a file object, where the replacement doesn't have > > a fileno() method. > > > > In that sort of situation an AttributeError would be raised, which > > isn't going to be caught as either OSError or ValueError, which is all > > the code watches out for. > > I don't know why it was implemented that way. File an issue on the > tracker and assign it to me (jnoller) please. My guess would be: because it's also possible for sys.stdin to be a file that's open in read+*write* mode, and for that file to have pending output buffered (for example, in the case of a socketfile). There's a general guideline, inherited from C, that one should ensure that the higher-level close() routine is invoked on a given file-descriptor in at most *one* process after that descriptor has passed through a fork(); in the other (probably child) processes, the lower-level close() routine should be called to avoid a double-flush--whereby buffered data is flushed out of one process, and then the *same* buffered data is flushed out of the (other) child-/parent-process' copy of the file-object. So, if you call sys.stdin.close() in the child-process in _bootstrap(), then it could lead to a double-flush corrupting output somewhere in the application that uses the multiprocessing module. You can expect similar issues with just about /any/ `file-like objects' that might have `file-like semantics' of buffering data and flushing it on close, also--because you end up with multiple copies of the same object in `pre-flush' state, and each copy tries to flush at some point. As such, I'd recommend against just using .close(); you might use something like `if hasattr(sys.stdin, "fileno"): ...'; but, if your `else' clause unconditionally calls sys.stdin.close(), then you still have double-flush problems if someone's set sys.stdin to a file-like object with output-buffering. I guess you could try calling that an `edge-case' and seeing if anyone screams. It'd be sort-of nice if there was finer granularity in the file API--maybe if file.close() took a boolean `flush' argument....
|msg86024 - (view)||Author: Marcin Cieslik (i000)||Date: 2009-04-16 12:11|
Hello, I believe I am the edge-case. I've written a minimalist python Tkinter-shell around Tkinter.Text and code.InteractiveConsole by hi-jacking stdin, stdout and stderr. It "hangs" when using multiprocessing pool. to reproduce run papy_gui.py and type: >>> from math import sqrt >>> from multiprocessing import Pool >>> p = Pool() >>> print p <multiprocessing.pool.Pool object at 0xb723738c> >>> p.map(sqrt, [1,2,3]) <<no more output ever>>
|msg89195 - (view)||Author: OG7 (OG7)||Date: 2009-06-10 11:19|
Using sys.stdin.close() fixes issues 5155 and 5331.
|msg89198 - (view)||Author: Graham Dumpleton (grahamd)||Date: 2009-06-10 11:39|
Worth noting is that Python documentation in: http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html says: """ file.fileno() Return the integer “file descriptor” that is used by the underlying implementation to request I/O operations from the operating system. This can be useful for other, lower level interfaces that use file descriptors, such as the fcntl module or os.read() and friends. Note File-like objects which do not have a real file descriptor should not provide this method! """ So, if sys.stdin is replaced with a file like object, then the code should not be assuming that fileno() even exists. At the moment the code doesn't check for AttributeError which is what is going to be raised for trying to access non existent fileno() method. """ >>> import StringIO >>> s=StringIO.StringIO("xxx") >>> s.fileno() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: StringIO instance has no attribute 'fileno' """ Thus error propagates. The better check though would be to use: def _bootstrap(self): .... if sys.stdin is not None and hasattr(sys.stdin, "fileno"): try: os.close(sys.stdin.fileno()) except (OSError, ValueError): pass That is, only actually call fileno() if it is present. This would solve the problem for the original reported issue by making it actually adhere to what Python documentation says about existence of fileno(). This change wouldn't necessarily solve other peoples related issues though.
|msg89199 - (view)||Author: Pablo Torres Navarrete (ptn)||Date: 2009-06-10 13:58|
Wouldn't it be more pythonic to just try sys.stdin.fileno() and catch the AtributeError too? def _bootstrap(self): .... try: os.close(sys.stdin.fileno()) except AtributeError: sys.stdin.close() except (OSError, ValueError): pass
|msg89205 - (view)||Author: OG7 (OG7)||Date: 2009-06-10 15:12|
Closing the stdin fd without closing the stdin file is very dangerous. It means that stdin will now access some random resource, for example, a pipe created with os.pipe(). Closing stdin is useful to let the parent be alone in reading from it. It can be achieved by replacing stdin by open('/dev/null'). The original stdin can be closed or left to be garbage collected. The "double flush" case is impossible to handle in general. It's the libc's responsibility for standard file objects and sockets. But it can't be helped (except by putting a warning in the documentation) if someone combines multiprocessing with non-fork-safe code that keeps its own buffers and doesn't check for a pid change. So that code in _bootstrap should be: sys.stdin.close() sys.stdin = open(os.devnull)
|msg89522 - (view)||Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) *||Date: 2009-06-19 15:14|
Attached is a patch which calls close() first, and then attempts to close the fd. In the case of an attribute errors (fileno doesn't exist) we simply set it to devnull. This is just a thought, feedback welcome - right now this allows this fixes issue 5155 and 5331 (and this issue)
|msg89523 - (view)||Author: OG7 (OG7)||Date: 2009-06-19 15:55|
Please do this: --- a/multiprocessing/process.py +++ b/multiprocessing/process.py @@ -225,7 +225,8 @@ class Process(object): self._children = set() self._counter = itertools.count(1) try: - os.close(sys.stdin.fileno()) + sys.stdin.close() + sys.stdin = open(os.devnull) except (OSError, ValueError): pass _current_process = self One shouldn't close the fileno after the file has been closed. The stdlib raises an error, and the open(os.devnull) won't be reached. If no error was thrown, it would be worse. This would be closing a fileno that doesn't belong to sys.stdin anymore and may be used somewhere else. The open(os.devnull) bit is both so that no one tries to do anything with the old stdin anymore, and to let applications attempt to read from stdin without an IOError.
|msg89529 - (view)||Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) *||Date: 2009-06-19 21:53|
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:55 AM, OG7<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > OG7 <email@example.com> added the comment: > > One shouldn't close the fileno after the file has been closed. The > stdlib raises an error, and the open(os.devnull) won't be reached. If no > error was thrown, it would be worse. This would be closing a fileno that > doesn't belong to sys.stdin anymore and may be used somewhere else. > > The open(os.devnull) bit is both so that no one tries to do anything > with the old stdin anymore, and to let applications attempt to read from > stdin without an IOError. Fair enough, I was worried a bit about skipping the os.close(sys.stdin.fileno()) - the tests pass with both (because the close fixes the basic problem). I need to come up with an appropriate documentation note about the double flush issue, add in the tests I gleaned from the other bugs and commit it. I'll post the full doc/tests/code patch before doing so.
|msg89900 - (view)||Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) *||Date: 2009-06-30 03:03|
Attached is a patch with docs, tests and the fix as suggested by OG7 (whom I can't add to the ACKS without a real name). Please check the additional doc note I added to the all platforms programming guidelines.
|msg89943 - (view)||Author: Jesse Noller (jnoller) *||Date: 2009-06-30 17:13|
Committed in r73708 on trunk
|2011-01-08 11:33:02||pitrou||link||issue10174 superseder|
|2009-06-30 17:13:43||jnoller||set||status: open -> closed|
messages: + msg89943
|2009-06-30 12:22:55||jnoller||set||files: - 0001-Fix-issue-5313.patch|
|2009-06-30 12:22:43||jnoller||set||files: - stdin-patchv1.patch|
messages: + msg89900
|2009-06-19 21:53:44||jnoller||set||messages: + msg89529|
messages: + msg89523
keywords: + patch
messages: + msg89522
|2009-06-10 15:12:45||OG7||set||messages: + msg89205|
messages: + msg89199
|2009-06-10 11:39:21||grahamd||set||messages: + msg89198|
messages: + msg89195
nosy: + i000
messages: + msg86024
|2009-03-29 14:39:17||jnoller||set||priority: low|
|2009-02-21 19:53:44||jnoller||set||messages: + msg82579|
|2009-02-19 16:25:32||jnoller||set||assignee: jnoller|