➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2020-11-03 17:49 by signing_agreement, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg380287 - (view) | Author: (signing_agreement) * | Date: 2020-11-03 17:49 | |
inspect.getmembers should have a generator version. |
|||
| msg380289 - (view) | Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) *  |
Date: 2020-11-03 18:18 | |
why? |
|||
| msg380295 - (view) | Author: (signing_agreement) * | Date: 2020-11-03 19:23 | |
The object it deals with is already loaded, but in cases I see online, users tend to examine one member at a time. |
|||
| msg380298 - (view) | Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) * |
Date: 2020-11-03 20:09 | |
I personally don't think it is worthwhile to add another API for this without a good use case. The memory overhead of eagerly creating a list should be fairly small. |
|||
| msg380300 - (view) | Author: (signing_agreement) * | Date: 2020-11-03 20:20 | |
That is a fair point. I selected a few popular python libraries to test, and they all return a small list. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:37 | admin | set | github: 86420 |
| 2020-11-03 20:20:54 | signing_agreement | set | status: open -> closed messages: + msg380300 stage: resolved |
| 2020-11-03 20:09:09 | ronaldoussoren | set | messages: + msg380298 |
| 2020-11-03 19:23:38 | signing_agreement | set | messages: + msg380295 |
| 2020-11-03 18:18:33 | ronaldoussoren | set | nosy:
+ ronaldoussoren messages: + msg380289 |
| 2020-11-03 17:49:42 | signing_agreement | create | |