The Python documentation says about hashability in the glossary (https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-hashable):

"Objects which are instances of user-defined classes are hashable by default."

This is not quite true. Objects of a user-defined class with an __eq__ method are not hashable. Maybe it would be better to make this more explicit:

"Objects which are instances of user_defined classes without custom __eq__ and __hash__ methods are hashable by default."

The docs look correct to me:

    >>> class A:
            pass

    >>> hash(A())
    274859987

User defined classes are in-fact hashable by default.  Other methods can be defined to change hashability, but they are not the default.

FWIW, it isn't the purpose of the glossary to be a language spec; rather, it is to provide a rough meaning of what the word "hashable" means.  Already, the wording has exceeded its original intent.  The correct place for a more detailed specification in the language reference for object.__hash__():

   https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html?highlight=__hash__#object.__hash__

Thank you for the suggestion, but we'll pass on this one.

My point was that it's not immediately obvious what "by default" means and that hashability is not only affected by the __hash__ method but also by __eq__.

But I agree, you can argue that "by default" already includes not adding any special methods like __eq__ and the glossary should not become too verbose. (I remember these words from Donald Knuth in one of his books: "In the interest of conciseness, you need to indulge in simplifications that are really little lies; these should be overlooked.")