Issue1516375
Created on 2006-07-03 14:30 by collinwinter, last changed 2008-01-06 22:29 by admin.
|
msg50591 - (view) |
Author: Collin Winter (collinwinter) |
Date: 2006-07-03 14:30 |
|
As mentioned in PEP 3100, this patch removes the
interpreter's support for sys.exitfunc.
This patch is against r47222.
|
|
msg50592 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) |
Date: 2007-03-13 20:26 |
|
How is the atexit module to work after this patch?
(It could be reimplemented in C and reuse the old exitfunc functionality.)
|
|
msg50593 - (view) |
Author: Collin Winter (collinwinter) |
Date: 2007-03-13 20:30 |
|
Guido suggested renaming sys.exitfunc to sys._exitfunc: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-March/006100.html
|
|
msg50594 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) |
Date: 2007-03-13 20:47 |
|
Hm, that doesn't make me too happy. Why do we need exitfunc at all if we have atexit?
|
|
msg50595 - (view) |
Author: Collin Winter (collinwinter) |
Date: 2007-03-13 20:51 |
|
Me, either. I'd prefer to reimplement atexit in C and make use of something like the Py_AtExit-related functionality in pythonrun.c.
|
|
msg50596 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) |
Date: 2007-03-13 20:54 |
|
Then let's come up with a patch and sneak it in while Guido isn't watching <wink>
|
|
msg50597 - (view) |
Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) |
Date: 2007-03-14 19:51 |
|
See #1680961 for an atexit rewrite.
In any case, I think we can close this.
|
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008-01-06 22:29:46 | admin | set | keywords:
- py3k versions:
+ Python 3.0 |
| 2006-07-03 14:30:44 | collinwinter | create | |
|