➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2012-01-17 10:21 by dwt, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg151439 - (view) | Author: Martin Häcker (dwt) | Date: 2012-01-17 10:21 | |
[].sort() returns None which means you can't chain it. So for example someDict.keys().sort()[0] doesn't work but you have to use sorted(someDict.keys())[0] instead which is harder to read as you have to read the line not from the beginning to the end but jump back and forth in it to understand it (which gets progressively harder as the individual parts of it get longer / more complex). |
|||
| msg151440 - (view) | Author: Martin Häcker (dwt) | Date: 2012-01-17 10:22 | |
It really should return self. |
|||
| msg151441 - (view) | Author: Ezio Melotti (ezio.melotti) *  |
Date: 2012-01-17 10:24 | |
This is by design. Methods that mutate the object return None. Methods that create a new object return the new object. list.sort sorts the list in place, so it returns None. |
|||
| msg151442 - (view) | Author: Ezio Melotti (ezio.melotti) * |
Date: 2012-01-17 10:28 | |
See also http://docs.python.org/faq/design.html#why-doesn-t-list-sort-return-the-sorted-list |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:25 | admin | set | github: 58013 |
| 2012-01-17 10:28:59 | ezio.melotti | set | messages: + msg151442 |
| 2012-01-17 10:24:35 | ezio.melotti | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + ezio.melotti messages: + msg151441 resolution: rejected stage: resolved |
| 2012-01-17 10:22:07 | dwt | set | messages: + msg151440 |
| 2012-01-17 10:21:51 | dwt | create | |