➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2011-06-17 18:16 by gruszczy, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| 12354.patch | gruszczy, 2011-06-17 18:20 | review | ||
| Messages (7) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg138538 - (view) | Author: Filip Gruszczyński (gruszczy) | Date: 2011-06-17 18:16 | |
In documentation for packaging.pypi.simple in first code snippet crawler variable is created on which further operations will be performed. However in all next snippets there is client variable, which is a little confusing on first sight. This could be consistent throughout the whole page. |
|||
| msg138539 - (view) | Author: Filip Gruszczyński (gruszczy) | Date: 2011-06-17 18:20 | |
And a small, quick patch to docs. |
|||
| msg138540 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) *  |
Date: 2011-06-17 18:22 | |
Thanks for the report. I’m editing the doc to fix all instances of client and also improve phrasing in the whole file. |
|||
| msg138985 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2011-06-24 21:03 | |
Doc update in 8de5fe3b1696 |
|||
| msg162056 - (view) | Author: Petri Lehtinen (petri.lehtinen) * |
Date: 2012-06-01 08:26 | |
Can this be closed? |
|||
| msg162091 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2012-06-01 18:08 | |
Not yet; the commit was adding missing doc to the Crawler class, but I haven’t reviewed the use of client vs. crawler yet. Alexis, you introduced the client/crawler naming after reading some book; what do you think now? |
|||
| msg162344 - (view) | Author: Alexis Metaireau (alexis) *  |
Date: 2012-06-05 14:01 | |
> Alexis, you introduced the client/crawler naming after reading some book; what do you think now?
Making the distinction between a crawler and a client is probably not a
good idea since it introduces two concepts instead of one simple one.
We have indexes and different ways to access them: What about having an
"XMLRPCClient" and a "SimpleClient"?
In addition, having a simpler API, something like
packaging.indexes.get_client('simple' OR 'xmlrpc') can be useful, but
that's a different issue.
|
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:18 | admin | set | github: 56563 |
| 2014-03-13 04:26:05 | eric.araujo | set | status: open -> closed resolution: out of date stage: resolved |
| 2012-06-05 14:14:17 | petri.lehtinen | set | nosy:
- petri.lehtinen |
| 2012-06-05 14:01:33 | alexis | set | messages: + msg162344 |
| 2012-06-01 18:08:34 | eric.araujo | set | status: pending -> open messages: + msg162091 title: packaging.pypi.simple docs use both client and crawler variable, which might be confusing -> packaging.pypi.simple docs use both client and crawler name, which might be confusing |
| 2012-06-01 08:59:35 | petri.lehtinen | set | status: open -> pending |
| 2012-06-01 08:26:10 | petri.lehtinen | set | nosy:
+ petri.lehtinen messages: + msg162056 |
| 2011-06-24 21:03:10 | eric.araujo | set | messages: + msg138985 |
| 2011-06-17 18:22:34 | eric.araujo | set | assignee: docs@python -> eric.araujo messages: + msg138540 |
| 2011-06-17 18:20:12 | gruszczy | set | files:
+ 12354.patch keywords: + patch messages: + msg138539 |
| 2011-06-17 18:16:14 | gruszczy | create | |