➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2011-01-22 18:02 by k1h, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| asyncore_timeout_patch_with_example.txt | k1h, 2011-01-22 18:02 | asyncore timeout patch with example | ||
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg126846 - (view) | Author: k1h (k1h) | Date: 2011-01-22 18:02 | |
Asyncore for the versions of Python examined do not check for the empty sequences select.select returns to indicate a timeout. The attached patch served my immediate needs, but no effort was made to verify that all scenarios were covered or that other issues weren't introduced. |
|||
| msg126852 - (view) | Author: Giampaolo Rodola' (giampaolo.rodola) *  |
Date: 2011-01-22 18:48 | |
You have misinterpreted the purpose of timeout argument. "timeout" argument tells select() or poll() how long they have to wait before returning in case no file descriptors are ready. This has nothing to do with asyncore.loop() which is supposed to keep running except when: - all file descriptors have been closed/extinguished - the count argument is provided ...in which case it finally returns. Closing out as invalid. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:11 | admin | set | github: 55191 |
| 2011-01-22 18:48:23 | giampaolo.rodola | set | status: open -> closed messages: + msg126852 resolution: not a bug nosy: giampaolo.rodola, k1h |
| 2011-01-22 18:05:03 | pitrou | set | nosy:
+ giampaolo.rodola type: behavior versions: - Python 2.6, Python 2.5 |
| 2011-01-22 18:02:50 | k1h | create | |