Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(6)

#14202: The docs of xml.dom.pulldom are almost nonexistent

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
7 years, 10 months ago by eliben
Modified:
7 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
merwok
CC:
eric.araujo, eli.bendersky, flox, docs_python.org, devnull_psf.upfronthosting.co.za, flomm
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 7

Patch Set 2 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 3 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats Patch
Doc/library/xml.dom.pulldom.rst View 2 chunks +67 lines, -14 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 3
eli.bendersky
http://bugs.python.org/review/14202/diff/4339/15556 File Doc/library/xml.dom.pulldom.rst (right): http://bugs.python.org/review/14202/diff/4339/15556#newcode15 Doc/library/xml.dom.pulldom.rst:15: processing them, although in contrast to SAX which also ...
7 years, 10 months ago #1
eric.araujo
I don’t like that the patch removes documentation stubs for some classes and methods. I ...
7 years, 10 months ago #2
eli.bendersky
7 years, 10 months ago #3
On 2012/03/16 03:34:35, eric.araujo wrote:
> I don’t like that the patch removes documentation stubs for some classes and
> methods.  I think they should be expanded or at worst stay as they are in the
> hope of future improvement, not deleted.  What do you think?
> 

Yes, I agree. Just keep them there with empty descriptions.
Sign in to reply to this message.

RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld 894c83f36cb7+