This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author brian.curtin
Recipients brian.curtin, georg.brandl, r.david.murray, techtonik
Date 2010-02-16.17:36:57
SpamBayes Score 0.000989381
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1266341819.33.0.648378754297.issue7939@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
"This module also defines two shortcut functions"

I think given that we say the calls are shortcuts, and that their arguments are the same as Popen, I take that to mean that subprocess.call experiences the same situations as subprocess.Popen.

If any change has to be made, I could get on board with changing "two shortcut functions" to "two Popen shortcut functions".
History
Date User Action Args
2010-02-16 17:36:59brian.curtinsetrecipients: + brian.curtin, georg.brandl, techtonik, r.david.murray
2010-02-16 17:36:59brian.curtinsetmessageid: <1266341819.33.0.648378754297.issue7939@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-02-16 17:36:57brian.curtinlinkissue7939 messages
2010-02-16 17:36:57brian.curtincreate