This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author techtonik
Recipients georg.brandl, r.david.murray, techtonik
Date 2010-02-16.15:22:22
SpamBayes Score 2.86098e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1266333744.15.0.773432603838.issue7939@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I can't see changes to subprocess.call() docs in issue #6760. I reopen this bug, because call() definitely need a visible note about this significant behavior. I can not reopen #6760

http://docs.python.org/library/subprocess.html#convenience-functions
History
Date User Action Args
2010-02-16 15:22:24techtoniksetrecipients: + techtonik, georg.brandl, r.david.murray
2010-02-16 15:22:24techtoniksetmessageid: <1266333744.15.0.773432603838.issue7939@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-02-16 15:22:22techtoniklinkissue7939 messages
2010-02-16 15:22:22techtonikcreate