Author mark.dickinson
Recipients gumtree, mark.dickinson, meador.inge
Date 2010-02-04.11:59:20
SpamBayes Score 2.88362e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1265284763.15.0.00206477115021.issue5211@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Yes, that was what I was proposing.  But as you point out, the new
> behaviour wouldn't even match the behaviour of Python 3.x, so it really
> wouldn't be a terribly useful change.

Hmm.  I take this back:  if complex were made 'new-style' in 2.7, then it *would* be possible to write fairly obvious code (not using coerce or __coerce__) that operated in the same way in both 2.7 and 3.2.  So I still think it's worth considering.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-02-04 11:59:23mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, gumtree, meador.inge
2010-02-04 11:59:23mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1265284763.15.0.00206477115021.issue5211@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-02-04 11:59:21mark.dickinsonlinkissue5211 messages
2010-02-04 11:59:20mark.dickinsoncreate