Author pitrou
Recipients akuchling, cjw296, nascheme, pitrou
Date 2010-01-24.01:25:15
SpamBayes Score 5.37644e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1264296387.4710.0.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to <>
> > The documentation mentions that mhlib is deprecated and mailbox
> > should be used instead. Is there any point in trying to fix it?
> It looks like Btrfs will eventually conform to traditional st_nlink
> behavior. However, that still leaves HFS+.

That wasn't really my question. What I ask is: since mhlib is
deprecated, why do we need to fix it while people are encouraged to use
mailbox instead?
And, besides, does mailbox show the same problem?
Date User Action Args
2010-01-24 01:25:18pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, akuchling, nascheme, cjw296
2010-01-24 01:25:16pitroulinkissue7759 messages
2010-01-24 01:25:15pitroucreate