Message96911
Hi,
Might I suggest that, whatever the outcome of the re-adding intobject.h
discussion, the documentation is updated? I think I'm not the only
module author which spent time trying to understand why the 3.1
documentation refers to non-existent header before finally finding this
bug :)
thanks a lot,
iustin |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-12-27 15:43:02 | iustin | set | recipients:
+ iustin, lemburg, gvanrossum, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, dmalcolm |
2009-12-27 15:43:02 | iustin | set | messageid: <1261928582.3.0.189621309382.issue7353@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-12-27 15:43:00 | iustin | link | issue7353 messages |
2009-12-27 15:43:00 | iustin | create | |
|