Author pitrou
Recipients djc, ed_abraham, ivo, pitrou, skip.montanaro
Date 2009-12-08.01:40:19
SpamBayes Score 0.00932487
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1260236451.3381.25.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to <>
> Isn't the alpha period (2.7 and 3.2 in this case) precisely when an API can
> change?

Well, it can, but only if there are compelling reasons to do so. It
should be the exception rather than the rule.
The reasons here seem far from compelling, and moreover we can't detect
whether the user is expecting the new or the old behaviour.
Date User Action Args
2009-12-08 01:40:21pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, skip.montanaro, ed_abraham, djc, ivo
2009-12-08 01:40:19pitroulinkissue1537721 messages
2009-12-08 01:40:19pitroucreate