Message96072
@techtonik: If you have a specific feature request for argparse, I
recommend that you file an issue on the argparse tracker[1]. I assure
you that despite the fact that you only have need for a couple of the
constructor parameters, the rest exist because people have asked for
them. Fortunately, since they're keyword parameters, you only have to
specify the ones that you care about.
[1]http://code.google.com/p/argparse/issues/list |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-12-07 20:59:38 | bethard | set | recipients:
+ bethard, loewis, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, orsenthil, eric.smith, techtonik, aronacher, jnoller, r.david.murray, michael.foord, rickysarraf, marklodato |
2009-12-07 20:59:38 | bethard | set | messageid: <1260219578.78.0.545250946946.issue6247@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-12-07 20:59:37 | bethard | link | issue6247 messages |
2009-12-07 20:59:36 | bethard | create | |
|