➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients brett.cannon, eric.smith, kszawala, mark.dickinson
Date 2009-12-03.12:17:36
SpamBayes Score 0.0017543581
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1259842658.52.0.569689440596.issue6985@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I suspect the ints in builtin_range should have been changed to Py_ssize_t 
when PEP 353 was implemented.  I've fixed them in trunk in r76625;  it 
doesn't seem worth changing this in the 2.6 branch.

So on an LP64 machine with sufficient memory, range(2**31) should now 
work.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-12-03 12:17:39mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, brett.cannon, eric.smith, kszawala
2009-12-03 12:17:38mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1259842658.52.0.569689440596.issue6985@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-12-03 12:17:36mark.dickinsonlinkissue6985 messages
2009-12-03 12:17:36mark.dickinsoncreate