Message94946
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Raymond Hettinger
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> Martin has already rejected a similar proposal for similar reasons.
> Please drop this one.
Sure. In fact I've never proposed to apply this patch. As I said in
my original submission, the only purpose of reviving issue1507011 is
this way was to give an easy way for users who claimed that in their
apps saving 4-8 bytes per interned string would make a difference to
test their claim.
Just as with issue1507011 three years ago I personally did not see
noticeable improvements in my applications from the patch. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-11-05 21:03:32 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.smith |
2009-11-05 21:03:30 | belopolsky | link | issue7224 messages |
2009-11-05 21:03:30 | belopolsky | create | |
|