Message93289
> What does changing the type of the "author" field make clearer exactly?
It "Author" not "Authors", that's the difference. Like we have
"Classifiers" and not "Classifier".
Plus, I am not breaking any compatibility here.
A multi-value field in the metadata in Distutils just means that you
might find several lines starting with
{{{
Author:
}}}
And that Distutils will be able to recognized both forms, exactly like
it does with Metadata v1.0 and metadata v1.1.
> I'm bothered that many people currently seem to think that it's ok
> to compatibility for whatever non-critical reason. This is not
> the way we will make Python a reliable platform to use and develop for.
I don't know who you are reffering to, but if you look carefully at the
work I've been doing in Distutils, I have never and I will never do any
gratuitously change whatsoever.
I am bothered that more and more are people constantly jumping on my
back everytime I try to make Distutils evolves a bit or everytime I
discuss some feature proposals with the community.
Any change to the metadata fields will require a PEP 341 change, so
everyone will be free to do a +1 or a -1.
But saying that making the metadata evolve "is not the way we will make
Python a reliable platform to use and develop for" is completely
wrong imho. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-09-29 13:45:02 | tarek | set | recipients:
+ tarek, lemburg, pitrou, techtonik |
2009-09-29 13:45:02 | tarek | set | messageid: <1254231902.01.0.0642377880596.issue6992@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-09-29 13:44:59 | tarek | link | issue6992 messages |
2009-09-29 13:44:58 | tarek | create | |
|