This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tarek
Recipients lemburg, pitrou, tarek, techtonik
Date 2009-09-29.13:44:58
SpamBayes Score 1.6696878e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1254231902.01.0.0642377880596.issue6992@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> What does changing the type of the "author" field make clearer exactly? 

It "Author" not "Authors", that's the difference. Like we have
"Classifiers" and not "Classifier".

Plus, I am not breaking any compatibility here.

A multi-value field in the metadata in Distutils just means that you
might find several lines starting with 

{{{
Author:
}}}

And that Distutils will be able to recognized both forms, exactly like
it does with Metadata v1.0 and metadata v1.1.

> I'm bothered that many people currently seem to think that it's ok 
> to compatibility for whatever non-critical reason. This is not 
> the way we will make Python a reliable platform to use and develop for.

I don't know who you are reffering to, but if you look carefully at the
work I've been doing in Distutils, I have never and I will never do any
gratuitously change whatsoever. 

I am bothered that more and more are people constantly jumping on my
back everytime I try to make Distutils evolves a bit or everytime I
discuss some feature proposals with the community.

Any change to the metadata fields will require a PEP 341 change, so
everyone will be free to do a +1 or a -1.

But saying that making the metadata evolve "is not the way we will make
Python a reliable platform to use and develop for" is completely
wrong imho.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-09-29 13:45:02tareksetrecipients: + tarek, lemburg, pitrou, techtonik
2009-09-29 13:45:02tareksetmessageid: <1254231902.01.0.0642377880596.issue6992@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-09-29 13:44:59tareklinkissue6992 messages
2009-09-29 13:44:58tarekcreate