This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, jafo, jaraco, lemburg, loewis, nnorwitz, r.david.murray, swarren
Date 2009-09-02.18:50:39
SpamBayes Score 1.5071056e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> I plan to look at this, and if it looks okay, commit it. Let me know if
> anyone has any remaining issues.

I have the general issue that the semantics of the Windows symlink
implementation are ill-defined. Specifically for the patch, I think
precise documentation of the implemented behavior is is missing (unless
it behaves like Unix symlink to the tiniest detail, which I doubt).
Without an exact specification of what it should do it is difficult
to tell whether it does that correctly.
Date User Action Args
2009-09-02 18:50:40loewissetrecipients: + loewis, lemburg, nnorwitz, jafo, jaraco, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, swarren, r.david.murray
2009-09-02 18:50:39loewislinkissue1578269 messages
2009-09-02 18:50:39loewiscreate