Message91289
Raymond, I know you see this differently, but personally I don't see a
problem with 2.7 getting additional backports of 3.x features, as long
as they are backwards compatible. While personally I wouldn't spend
effort on this particular backport, I don't see a problem when someone
volunteers a patch. In this specific case, I am fine with accepting set
literals and set comprehensions as new syntax. I do agree that repr()
needs to be kept the same as it was under 2.6. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-08-05 00:35:14 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, brett.cannon, rhettinger, alexandre.vassalotti, benjamin.peterson |
2009-08-05 00:35:14 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1249432514.19.0.487868777584.issue2335@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-08-05 00:35:13 | gvanrossum | link | issue2335 messages |
2009-08-05 00:35:12 | gvanrossum | create | |
|