Message 90489 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	JPosthuma
Recipients	JPosthuma, benjamin.peterson, djarb, giampaolo.rodola, intgr, janssen, josiah.carlson, josiahcarlson, r.david.murray
Date	2009-07-13.15:26:32
SpamBayes Score	3.2547694e-05
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1247498794.38.0.595073177918.issue1563@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
It's not 'that' clear you should only work with bytes on a socket. Especially not when using a wrapper like asynchat. They are supposed to make it easier, and passing a string is easier. Maybe it's possible to do a default byte conversion when the user is working with strings.

It's not 'that' clear you should only work with bytes on a socket. 
Especially not when using a wrapper like asynchat. They are supposed to 
make it easier, and passing a string is easier. Maybe it's possible to do 
a default byte conversion when the user is working with strings.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-07-13 15:26:34	JPosthuma	set	recipients: + JPosthuma, josiahcarlson, janssen, giampaolo.rodola, djarb, josiah.carlson, benjamin.peterson, r.david.murray, intgr
2009-07-13 15:26:34	JPosthuma	set	messageid: <1247498794.38.0.595073177918.issue1563@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-07-13 15:26:32	JPosthuma	link	issue1563 messages
2009-07-13 15:26:32	JPosthuma	create