Message89425
Does that mean that nested() can be removed or changed incompatibly in
3.2 at the same time that an alternative way for handling the remaining
use case is introduced?
This would seem to violate the promise in PEP 5, that "users will have
at least a year to test their programs and migrate them from use of the
deprecated construct to the alternative one". |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-06-16 07:37:07 | hagen | set | recipients:
+ hagen, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson |
2009-06-16 07:37:07 | hagen | set | messageid: <1245137827.12.0.786737957083.issue6288@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-06-16 07:37:05 | hagen | link | issue6288 messages |
2009-06-16 07:37:04 | hagen | create | |
|