This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author hagen
Recipients benjamin.peterson, hagen, ncoghlan
Date 2009-06-16.07:37:04
SpamBayes Score 0.00026063996
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1245137827.12.0.786737957083.issue6288@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Does that mean that nested() can be removed or changed incompatibly in
3.2 at the same time that an alternative way for handling the remaining
use case is introduced?

This would seem to violate the promise in PEP 5, that "users will have
at least a year to test their programs and migrate them from use of the
deprecated construct to the alternative one".
History
Date User Action Args
2009-06-16 07:37:07hagensetrecipients: + hagen, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson
2009-06-16 07:37:07hagensetmessageid: <1245137827.12.0.786737957083.issue6288@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-06-16 07:37:05hagenlinkissue6288 messages
2009-06-16 07:37:04hagencreate