This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, loewis, ned.deily, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date 2009-06-08.19:43:09
SpamBayes Score 1.08687e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1244490329.5399.7.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to <>
> In principle, they could, yes - but what specific behavior might that
> be? What will change is character classification, which I consider
> fairly harmless. Also, multi-byte conversion routines will change, which
> is the primary reason for leaving it modified.

Ok, so I suppose we could leave the code as-is.
Date User Action Args
2009-06-08 19:43:10pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, georg.brandl, ned.deily, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray
2009-06-08 19:43:09pitroulinkissue6203 messages
2009-06-08 19:43:09pitroucreate