Author claymation
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, claymation, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, shields
Date 2009-06-02.06:34:59
SpamBayes Score 2.46692e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <8657ee3f0906012334h2653205fo73c5182be43db795@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <4A24C407.4010305@v.loewis.de>
Content
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>> I'd like to see the issues fixed upstream, and the library removed
>> from Python until it is satisfactory to the developers who will
>> actually use it. To my knowledge, every developer (outside of Google)
>> who has commented on the issue has indicated a preference for a
>> different API.
>
> That's not true - I'm outside of Google, and have not indicated such
> a preference.

You've indicated no preference either way, and have said:

"I personally have no plans for using this library, or any other IP
address library"

I should think you would seek the opinion of those developers who
actually do have plans to use an IP address library. As far as I can
tell, every developer in that category, outside of Google, that has
commented on this issue here or in python-dev has advocated a
different API.

Clay
History
Date User Action Args
2009-06-02 06:35:44claymationsetrecipients: + claymation, gvanrossum, loewis, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, oubiwann
2009-06-02 06:35:30claymationlinkissue3959 messages
2009-06-02 06:35:17claymationcreate