This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author claymation
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, claymation, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, shields
Date 2009-06-02.06:34:59
SpamBayes Score 2.46692e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <8657ee3f0906012334h2653205fo73c5182be43db795@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <4A24C407.4010305@v.loewis.de>
Content
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>> I'd like to see the issues fixed upstream, and the library removed
>> from Python until it is satisfactory to the developers who will
>> actually use it. To my knowledge, every developer (outside of Google)
>> who has commented on the issue has indicated a preference for a
>> different API.
>
> That's not true - I'm outside of Google, and have not indicated such
> a preference.

You've indicated no preference either way, and have said:

"I personally have no plans for using this library, or any other IP
address library"

I should think you would seek the opinion of those developers who
actually do have plans to use an IP address library. As far as I can
tell, every developer in that category, outside of Google, that has
commented on this issue here or in python-dev has advocated a
different API.

Clay
History
Date User Action Args
2009-06-02 06:35:44claymationsetrecipients: + claymation, gvanrossum, loewis, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, oubiwann
2009-06-02 06:35:30claymationlinkissue3959 messages
2009-06-02 06:35:17claymationcreate