Author loewis
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, claymation, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, shields
Date 2009-06-02.06:18:09
SpamBayes Score 0.000473169
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> I'd like to see the issues fixed upstream, and the library removed
> from Python until it is satisfactory to the developers who will
> actually use it. To my knowledge, every developer (outside of Google)
> who has commented on the issue has indicated a preference for a
> different API.

That's not true - I'm outside of Google, and have not indicated such
a preference.
Date User Action Args
2009-06-02 06:18:38loewissetrecipients: + loewis, gvanrossum, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, oubiwann, claymation
2009-06-02 06:18:27loewislinkissue3959 messages
2009-06-02 06:18:15loewiscreate