This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, claymation, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, mattsmart, oubiwann, pitrou, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, shields
Date 2009-06-02.05:19:18
SpamBayes Score 0.000148324
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <4A24B627.6060307@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <8657ee3f0906011747u213e7727w205f568189960636@mail.gmail.com>
Content
> Consider applications that need to validate addresses (or networks,
> but not both) supplied as user input:
> 
> address = ipaddr.IP(input)

If that is a frequent need, it would be reasonable to add an API

address = ipaddr.IP(input, allow_mask=False)

which would raise an exception if a mask was specified (as an
old-style bit mask, or in CIDR form).

> if isinstance(address, ipaddr.IPv4):
>    if address.prefixlen != 32:
>        raise TypeError("Expecting IP address, not network")
> elif isinstance(address, ipaddr.IPv6):
>    if address.prefixlen != 128:
>        raise TypeError("Expecting IP address, not network")

With the current API, you don't need to write it in such a quirky
way. Instead

if address.numhosts != 1:
   raise TypeError("Expecting IP address, not network")

would do as well.

> Given its myriad quirks

Well, you deliberately make it appear more quirky than it actually is.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-06-02 05:20:05loewissetrecipients: + loewis, gvanrossum, gregory.p.smith, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, mattsmart, shields, pmoody, pnasrat, r.david.murray, oubiwann, claymation
2009-06-02 05:20:00loewislinkissue3959 messages
2009-06-02 05:19:51loewiscreate