Message87318
> For the second, I don't understand why you want to
> compare the return result with RLIM_INFINITY: PyInt_AsLong
> returns -1 to signal failure; is there some guarantee that
> RLIM_INFINITY == -1 if it's defined?
rlim_t is an unsigned type. The idea of sign_warning_resource.patch
was to make gcc quiet about signed/unsigned comparaisons.
RLIM_INFINITY is defined as (rlim_t)-1. But it looks that it's not
clear, so I wrote another patch to fix the warnings. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-05-06 08:17:38 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, mark.dickinson |
2009-05-06 08:17:38 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1241597858.78.0.750914301331.issue5933@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-05-06 08:17:37 | vstinner | link | issue5933 messages |
2009-05-06 08:17:37 | vstinner | create | |
|