Message87079
On Sun, 3 May 2009 at 08:55, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> I am just wondering why we want to be quite different from how many
> other languages are approaching the issue. Sure enough, we can use a
> try: construct, but it kind of defeats the principle of least
> astonishment by being different from the rest on this issue.
Only if you imagine that the principal applies to expectations inherited
from other languages. In a Python context, which is what the principle
actually refers to, it would be astonishing if the error were to be
silently ignored. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-05-03 22:21:30 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, loewis, georg.brandl, catherinedevlin, jminka, heikki, asmodai |
2009-05-03 22:21:28 | r.david.murray | link | issue1443504 messages |
2009-05-03 22:21:27 | r.david.murray | create | |
|