Author rhettinger
Recipients ajaksu2, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, seesee
Date 2009-04-21.17:55:12
SpamBayes Score 0.00597898
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1240336514.64.0.628154699467.issue5786@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Essentially, the only argument for reverting this is breaking
compatibility with 2.6.0 and 2.6.1.  But, in the process, reverting it
means breaking compatibility with 2.6.2.  Since the cat is already out
of the bag for 2.6.2, I think the bugfix ought to be left in-place. 
It's too disruptive to switch back and forth during micro releases.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-04-21 17:55:15rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, ajaksu2, seesee
2009-04-21 17:55:14rhettingersetmessageid: <1240336514.64.0.628154699467.issue5786@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-04-21 17:55:13rhettingerlinkissue5786 messages
2009-04-21 17:55:12rhettingercreate