Author pitrou
Recipients benjamin.peterson, bob.ippolito, pitrou
Date 2009-04-08.16:01:34
SpamBayes Score 4.31112e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1239206585.8071.5.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <>
> Is this high priority? The pure-Python code paths don't even run in 
> cpython. I test them manually with simplejson by just deleting the 
> extension and then running the tests again. There doesn't seem to be a 
> very good way to do this sort of thing

The main reason I've put it as "high priority" is that right now I'm
porting the new json to py3k, and I can't know whether the pure Python
paths are ported correctly. That probably won't refrain us from
committing it, especially if you say that they are never run with
Date User Action Args
2009-04-08 16:01:36pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, bob.ippolito, benjamin.peterson
2009-04-08 16:01:34pitroulinkissue5723 messages
2009-04-08 16:01:34pitroucreate