Author pitrou
Recipients benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, michael.foord, ncoghlan, pitrou, pupeno, purcell, rhettinger, skip.montanaro
Date 2009-04-04.16:40:54
SpamBayes Score 0.0232356
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1238863342.6865.3.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <>
> I would *mmuch* prefer assertIsNot but it is not symmetrical with the
> other asserts.

Well, apparently assertIsNotNone() has been added, so it would be good
to be symmetrical with that :)
Date User Action Args
2009-04-04 16:40:56pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, purcell, ncoghlan, giampaolo.rodola, pupeno, benjamin.peterson, gpolo, michael.foord
2009-04-04 16:40:54pitroulinkissue2578 messages
2009-04-04 16:40:54pitroucreate