Author pitrou
Recipients benjamin.peterson, giampaolo.rodola, gpolo, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, michael.foord, ncoghlan, pitrou, pupeno, purcell, rhettinger, skip.montanaro
Date 2009-04-02.19:22:44
SpamBayes Score 5.30113e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1238700249.8858.33.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <>
> You don't, but use of assert statements seems a hell of a lot more Pythonic
> to me than all the assert* or fail* method names which I can never remember.

Two problems:
1. they are optimized away in "-Oxxx" mode
2. they don't provide good reporting in case of failure
Date User Action Args
2009-04-02 19:22:45pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, purcell, ncoghlan, giampaolo.rodola, pupeno, benjamin.peterson, gpolo, michael.foord
2009-04-02 19:22:44pitroulinkissue2578 messages
2009-04-02 19:22:44pitroucreate