Message85226
[Guido]
>> Looking back, I think Zope and Medusa should have adopted and evolved
>> their own copy of asynchat a long time ago...
[Jim]
> This statement is puzzling. No big deal, but I'm curious why you say
> this.
ISTR that Zope has or had significant monkeypatches to at least one of
asyncore/asynchat. The resulting coupling between Zope and asyn* has
meant that the de-facto API of asyn* was much more than the documented
API. IMO that's a sign of a poorly designed API (in asyn*). If Zope
had had its own copy of asyn* (under a different name of course) that
relied only on lower-level APIs (sockets and select), it could have
evolved that copy directly without the need for monkeypatching. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-04-02 17:27:01 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, akuchling, facundobatista, jafo, josiahcarlson, tseaver, forest, giampaolo.rodola, kevinwatters, djarb, stutzbach, markb, intgr, mcdonc, j1m |
2009-04-02 17:26:59 | gvanrossum | link | issue1641 messages |
2009-04-02 17:26:58 | gvanrossum | create | |
|