Message84432
2009/3/29 Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> added the comment:
>
> I would love to use the time machine to kill the 'fail' variants as well
> as 'assert_'. However they are in use and we don't want to break
> people's tests. Breaking tests is painful. And there are a lots of
> tests. So we'll have to support them for a long, long time. Maybe we
> can stop documenting them in 3.1 (this would also require changing
> things so that the 'def' lines all use the 'assert' variants). Then
> maybe we can start deprecating them in 3.2 and 3.3, and perhaps remove
> them in 3.4. I recommend we let 2.x alone, but 2to3 should fix all these.
Yes, actually this would be a great secondary use of 2to3's
infrastructure, and I think it could be done quite correctly because
people usually don't have many custom methods named failUnlessEqual()
etc.
Besides, they're tests, so people would know if they're broken. :) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-03-29 21:33:19 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients:
+ benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, skip.montanaro, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, purcell, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, pupeno, gpolo |
2009-03-29 21:33:17 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue2578 messages |
2009-03-29 21:33:10 | benjamin.peterson | create | |
|