Message83940
The next to last sentence should have read "and, we are not
obliged to carry that over to 3.x where cross-type ordering comparisons
are not the norm unless a type has specifically enabled them."
The gist of the idea is that in 2.x, we do have cross-type ordering
comparisons so we should make them as useful and non-misleading as
possible. But, in 3.x there is no default cross-type ordering
comparisons so we're not obliged to return any answer at all. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-03-21 17:42:22 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, facundobatista, mark.dickinson, jdunck, lorg |
2009-03-21 17:42:21 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1237657341.9.0.0448580091797.issue2531@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-03-21 17:42:06 | rhettinger | link | issue2531 messages |
2009-03-21 17:42:05 | rhettinger | create | |
|