Message83243
Thanks for the feedback, Guido!
gvanrossum wrote:
> You could maintain this as a locally modified version, but a better
> approach would be to make just enough changes to upload.py itself so
> that you can write the rest of this script as a *wrapper* around
> upload.py.
Yes, a wrapper is an option. MvL suggested a patch[1] and for this
initial implementation it makes things simpler. IIUC, in this case
upload.py would need no changes, as we simply populate existing
options with fetched values.
> PS. What do you mean by "wish we could expunge the deleted ones"? If
> you delete a Rietveld issue it is really gone. If you merely close it,
> you can still delete it later. But I'm probably missing something.
Yes, you're missing the fact that you were the one saying "wish we
could expunge the deleted ones" :)
upload.py fetched that from http://bugs.python.org/msg32813 because I
told it to:
python static/upload.py -R 400608 -F msg32813
[1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/2009-March/001875.html |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-03-06 13:54:52 | ajaksu2 | set | recipients:
+ ajaksu2 |
2009-03-06 13:54:51 | ajaksu2 | link | issue400608 messages |
2009-03-06 13:54:50 | ajaksu2 | create | |
|