Author forest
Recipients aronacher, forest, georg.brandl, jimjjewett, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2009-03-03.19:39:42
SpamBayes Score 0.00172834
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1236109184.42.0.605542561472.issue5397@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Shouldn't popitem() allow the caller to choose which end from
> which to pop?

Thinking it through a bit more, and LRU cache would actually need to
access the oldest item without necessarily removing it.  Besides,
popitem() should probably retain the signature of dict.popitem().  I
think I'll take this matter to python-dev.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-03-03 19:39:44forestsetrecipients: + forest, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, pitrou, aronacher
2009-03-03 19:39:44forestsetmessageid: <1236109184.42.0.605542561472.issue5397@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-03-03 19:39:43forestlinkissue5397 messages
2009-03-03 19:39:42forestcreate