➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients benjamin.peterson, ggenellina, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2009-02-28.18:19:01
SpamBayes Score 7.157687e-08
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1afaf6160902281019m1a6a92bewad0e0c6e2fc07e9@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1235844770.25.0.583479216482.issue3618@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
2009/2/28 Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Antoine Pitrou <pitrou@free.fr> added the comment:
>
> I don't know. The RLock is a lot slower than the normal non-recursive
> variation, on the other hand I'm not sure we care about performance of
> the Python version that much. Opinions welcome.

I'm +0. The deadlock will only affect people specifically messing with
the Python io implementation. It's low priority, so maybe we should
just do it when RLock is rewritten in C.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-28 18:19:04benjamin.petersonsetrecipients: + benjamin.peterson, gregory.p.smith, jcea, ggenellina, pitrou, vstinner
2009-02-28 18:19:02benjamin.petersonlinkissue3618 messages
2009-02-28 18:19:01benjamin.petersoncreate