This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, bob.ippolito, georg.brandl, loewis, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2009-02-28.10:43:51
SpamBayes Score 0.000201891
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> simplejson maintains Python 2.4+ compatibility, but json maintains 2.6+.
> I could produce another patch that manually removes these few remaining
> nits if it's necessary.

I don't quite understand this: isn't json/ and
simplejson/ essentially the same? why fork the one and not
the other?

However, as long as the compatibility requirements are documented
somewhere (e.g. PEP 291), it's fine with me.
Date User Action Args
2009-02-28 10:43:53loewissetrecipients: + loewis, georg.brandl, rhettinger, bob.ippolito, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, ajaksu2
2009-02-28 10:43:51loewislinkissue4136 messages
2009-02-28 10:43:51loewiscreate