Message82597
Thanks, Georg. And yes, I was indeed wondering why I found so few wayward
apostrophes!
Applied in r69846, r69847. I'm not sure whether it's worth backporting
these to 2.6 and 3.0.
> Please do not change builtin to built-in. In a python context, it reads
> fine as one word.
"built-in" seems to be the more common spelling within the documentation.
Personally, in the context of Python I find "builtin" acceptable as a noun
("don't shadow builtins"), but it still looks wrong when used as an
adjective ("the builtin function open"). Anyway, I'll refrain from making
any more of these changes. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-02-22 09:36:00 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, georg.brandl, rhettinger |
2009-02-22 09:36:00 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1235295360.2.0.356768504387.issue5341@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-02-22 09:34:53 | mark.dickinson | link | issue5341 messages |
2009-02-22 09:34:52 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|