Message82240
Zooko, the patches are available here:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/jds/spec-files/trunk/patches/
> Then you were arguing that defining _XOPEN_SOURCE is wrong if the value
Actually, I was saying that below that value simply won't work for many
extensions.
> What about setting the value to 600 or larger? Is that also wrong,
> and if so, why?
Practically: I don't know for sure about a larger value. As it is
presumably very close to POSIX, it shouldn't significantly harm the
ability to compile stuff. I can't say for sure. However, specifying
_XOPEN_SOURCE is still unnecessary I believe.
Theoretically: yes, it's wrong for Python to claim that all extensions
are compliant to a particular XPG environment.
If it helps, Martin, I can put you in touch with our standards expert.
I'm far from such, so this might help assuage your doubts? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-02-16 14:28:44 | movement | set | recipients:
+ movement, loewis, zooko |
2009-02-16 14:28:44 | movement | set | messageid: <1234794524.57.0.805130533492.issue1759169@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-02-16 14:26:59 | movement | link | issue1759169 messages |
2009-02-16 14:26:58 | movement | create | |
|