Author pitrou
Recipients nascheme, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date 2009-02-14.16:44:59
SpamBayes Score 5.34093e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1234629944.6357.13.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <>
> Maybe there should be a special flag modules can set to make them get
> cleared later in the interpreter cleanup procedure.  Modules could set
> it if they don't create reference cycles themselves and don't hold
> references to user objects.

Or, perhaps we could remove the assignment to None and use a
finalization scheme based on the garbage collector instead.
See #812369 (no patch for the above idea unfortunately).
Date User Action Args
2009-02-14 16:45:00pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, nascheme, ncoghlan
2009-02-14 16:44:59pitroulinkissue5178 messages
2009-02-14 16:44:59pitroucreate