This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author paul.moore
Recipients ajaksu2, ceder, fdrake, mhammond, paul.moore, tarek, tim.peters
Date 2009-02-14.12:42:39
SpamBayes Score 0.00028145558
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1234615361.69.0.866208865304.issue870479@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
In principle I don't have a problem with the automatic generation of an
EXE (I assume it generates a shell script with no extension on Unix?)
but it should be done in such a way that the EXE is version-independent.
This is necessary to ensure that pure-python packages, when made into
bdist_wininst installers, continue to be version-independent. (At the
moment, distutils generates version-dependent bdist_wininst packages
*only* for C extensions. Setuptools generates version-dependent
installers all the time, which is a pain).

This may mean that a reimplementation is required, rather than copying
the setuptools code.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-14 12:42:41paul.mooresetrecipients: + paul.moore, tim.peters, mhammond, fdrake, ceder, ajaksu2, tarek
2009-02-14 12:42:41paul.mooresetmessageid: <1234615361.69.0.866208865304.issue870479@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-02-14 12:42:40paul.moorelinkissue870479 messages
2009-02-14 12:42:39paul.moorecreate