This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients aurel32, doko, loewis, mark.dickinson, mirell, tim.peters
Date 2009-02-14.00:23:22
SpamBayes Score 1.00764e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <49960EF8.6010608@v.loewis.de>
In-reply-to <1234562388.42.0.708187136289.issue1762561@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> I'm still not sure whether this can be a candidate 2.6 and 3.0.  Martin, 
> do you have any thoughts on this?

I think this qualifies as a new port. In the past, we have avoided
adding new ports in bugfix releases.

As for adding it to 2.7/3.1: I'm also skeptical. We have a (fairly) new
policy of not adding support for minority platforms, based on the belief
that it is more effort than it is worth. Now, ARM in itself might be
considered a minority platform (for Python); however, I can accept
continued support for ARM based on the number of units available in the
real world, and based on the fact that the chip is still being
manufactured. Whether we need to support some old Linux ABI, I really
don't know, and I'm -0.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-02-14 00:23:24loewissetrecipients: + loewis, tim.peters, doko, mark.dickinson, aurel32, mirell
2009-02-14 00:23:22loewislinkissue1762561 messages
2009-02-14 00:23:22loewiscreate