This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, chemacortes, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2009-02-11.22:22:38
SpamBayes Score 0.000836215
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1234390997.8256.8.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <>
> I'm *much* more comfortable with a byte-swap, rotation, or xoring-in
> upper bits than with shifts that potentially destroy entropy. 
> Otherwise, your taxing apps that build giant sets/dicts and need all
> distinguishing bits to avoid collision pile-ups.

Would (id() >> 4) + (id() & 15) be ok?
Date User Action Args
2009-02-11 22:22:40pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, jcea, chemacortes, mark.dickinson, Rhamphoryncus
2009-02-11 22:22:38pitroulinkissue5186 messages
2009-02-11 22:22:38pitroucreate