Message 81610 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	ResulCetin, ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, craigh, dato, jhylton, pitrou, trodgers
Date	2009-02-10.22:31:04
SpamBayes Score	2.2658069e-09
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1234305066.41.0.889519325769.issue4631@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I took a look at the patch and it looks ok, apart from the _checkClosed() hack (but I don't think there's any immediate solution). It should be noted that HTTPResponse.readline() will be awfully slow since, as HTTPResponse doesn't have peek(), readline() will call read() one byte at a time... (slow I/O is nothing new in py3k, however :-))

I took a look at the patch and it looks ok, apart from the
_checkClosed() hack (but I don't think there's any immediate solution).
It should be noted that HTTPResponse.readline() will be awfully slow
since, as HTTPResponse doesn't have peek(), readline() will call read()
one byte at a time...

(slow I/O is nothing new in py3k, however :-))

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2009-02-10 22:31:06	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, jhylton, amaury.forgeotdarc, ajaksu2, craigh, dato, ResulCetin, trodgers
2009-02-10 22:31:06	pitrou	set	messageid: <1234305066.41.0.889519325769.issue4631@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-02-10 22:31:04	pitrou	link	issue4631 messages
2009-02-10 22:31:04	pitrou	create